Category: Uncategorized

  • What Is Real? Lessons from a virtual life

    Order of service and message presented to Unitarian Universalist Association staff chapel Nov 10, 2009

    What Is Real? Lessons from a virtual life

    By day, Kenneth Sutton is the mild-mannered managing editor of UU World magazine. But by night, he is Otenth Paderborn, gentleman, landowner, Steampunk, and DJ in the virtual world of Second Life.

    Chalice Lighting (by UUA Chaplain)

    At times our own light goes out and is rekindled by a spark from another person. Each of us has cause to think with deep gratitude of those who have lighted the flame within us.

    First Reading: A Psalm of Life, by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

    Tell me not, in mournful numbers,
    Life is but an empty dream! —
    For the soul is dead that slumbers,
    And things are not what they seem.

    Life is real! Life is earnest!
    And the grave is not its goal;
    Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
    Was not spoken of the soul.

    Not enjoyment, and not sorrow,
    Is our destined end or way;
    But to act, that each to-morrow
    Find us farther than to-day.

    Art is long, and Time is fleeting,
    And our hearts, though stout and brave,
    Still, like muffled drums, are beating
    Funeral marches to the grave.

    In the world’s broad field of battle,
    In the bivouac of Life,
    Be not like dumb, driven cattle!
    Be a hero in the strife!

    Trust no Future, howe’er pleasant!
    Let the dead Past bury its dead!
    Act, — act in the living Present!
    Heart within, and God o’erhead!

    Lives of great men all remind us
    We can make our lives sublime,
    And, departing, leave behind us
    Footprints on the sands of time;

    Footprints, that perhaps another,
    Sailing o’er life’s solemn main,
    A forlorn and shipwrecked brother,
    Seeing, shall take heart again.

    Let us, then, be up and doing,
    With a heart for any fate;
    Still achieving, still pursuing,
    Learn to labor and to wait.

    Hymn 315 This Old World

    Words from a traditional American hymn, adapted

    This old world is full of sorrow,
    Full of sickness, weak and sore.
    If you love your neighbour truly,
    Love will come to you the more.

    We’re all children of one family,
    We’re all brothers, sisters too.
    If you cherish one another
    Love and friendship come to you.

    This old world can be a garden,
    Full of fragrance, full of grace;
    If we love our neighbors truly,
    We must meet them face to face.

    It is said now, “Love thy neighbor,”
    And we know well that is true;
    This the sum of human labor,
    True for me as well as you.

    Sharing of Joys and Concerns

    Reading Macbeth Act 5, scene 5, 19–28, William Shakespeare

    Macbeth:
    To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
    Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
    To the last syllable of recorded time;
    And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
    The way to dusty death.
                                       Out, out, brief candle!
    Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player,
    That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
    And then is heard no more. It is a tale
    Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
    Signifying nothing.

    Hymn 109 As We Come Marching, Marching

    Words by James Oppenheim

    As we come marching, marching in the beauty of the day,
    A million darkened kitchens, a thousand mill lofts gray,
    Are touched with all the radiance that a sudden sun discloses,
    For the people hear us singing: “Bread and roses! Bread and roses!”

    As we come marching, marching, we battle too for men,
    For they are women’s children, and we mother them again.
    Our lives shall not be sweated from birth until life closes;
    Hearts starve as well as bodies; give us bread, but give us roses!

    As we come marching, marching, unnumbered women dead
    Go crying through our singing their ancient cry for bread.
    Small art and love and beauty their drudging spirits knew.
    Yes, it is bread we fight for — but we fight for roses, too!

    As we come marching, marching, we bring the greater days.
    The rising of the women means the rising of the race.
    No more the drudge and idler — ten that toil where one reposes,
    But a sharing of life’s glories: Bread and roses! Bread and roses!

    Sermon: What Is Real?

    I know I should aspire to ensure that each of you, while sitting here, has a good chance of connecting all the dots I made in my choices of readings and hymns. I fear, however, that is not how I approach reality. Reality is, first, rough-and-tumble, but it also has shifting appearances and defies easy definition. If you don’t see the connections (or if you imagine others of your own), I invite you to engage with me in that sort of discussion best carried out after work at the 21st Amendment.

    I’m involved in, and this service is inspired by my experiences in, Second Life, which is a persistent, three-dimensional, virtual, user-generated, social environment.

    I recently attended SteamCon, a science fiction convention in Seattle. I went in order to meet people I already knew from Second Life, the third time I have met friends I previously knew only virtually. It is the consistency of these experiences, as well as oft-heard ribbing about virtual worlds or “computer games” or “social media” that spurred these reflections, which I first presented in a nondenominational Christian church service in Second Life.

    Are the pixels one sees in Second Life real?
    In the sense that we are not each dreaming, or imagining the screens before us, they are real.
    They are real pixels, then.
    No, they are not flesh. No, I do not have horns (although two people at SteamCon both offered to make horns for me).
    To be real is to acknowledge inherent nature—and inherent limitations.

    Is art real? –and not just in the facile sense of being real canvas and pigment.
    And no, “I know it when I see it” isn’t a good answer, either.
    Neither is “I like it.”
    Art can take so many forms. What is it that makes it real art?
    Among other things, real art is created with intention by an artist.
    To be real is an acknowledgement of intent.
    Real art is meant to feed the spirit and heart.
    To be real is to acknowledge dimensions beyond what we can touch and see.

    Is a telephone conversation real? Are the people on the other end of this conference call real?
    Hello! Can anybody hear me?
    It is real sound, created by real electromagnetic energy.
    It is a real intention.
    But what makes it a real conversation is not only the intention (leaving a message in voice mail is not a conversation!)
    A real telephone conversation is communication.
    To be real is to communicate.

    Is love real?
    It is a real emotional state–whether reciprocated or not, whether permanent or not, it can cause real differences in behavior, resulting in physical action in the world.
    While it may take one by surprise, it is intentional when expressed.
    It is, hopefully, communication.
    But beyond that, healthy, mutual love is connection.
    To be real is to connect.

    So back to the pixels that one sees in Second Life.
    Beyond the reality of their pixelness, the reality of the images,
    they were created with intent
    sometimes they were created to inspire
    they were created to communicate
    they were created to allow us to connect.
    They are, while “only” real pixels, also real on a much deeper level.

    So, the people at SteamCon:
    Were the people real avatars?
    Sometimes the genders didn’t match.
    No one had horns, wings, or blue skin.
    Some people were multiple avatars.
    To acknowledge inherent nature, no, the humans and the avatars have a different inherent nature.

    And yet,
    and yet.
    *Is* the inherent nature actually different?
    It depends often on intent.
    Does the human intend to use the avatar to deceive?
    (Setting aside the fact that humans often intend to deceive, without the need for an avatar, and yet they are still “real” humans.)
    Does the human intend to obfuscate or deny the relationship to the avatar?
    (Setting aside the fact that humans often obfuscate or deny their previous actions, and yet they are still “real” humans.)
    Is there a congruence between what the human and the avatar communicate?
    Sometimes there is.
    In many ways, there is a consistency between what is communicated by the avatar and by the human.
    It doesn’t even have to be conscious–we humans are very good at reading one another’s subconscious communications.
    Even if an avatar is meant not to reveal anything “real” about the human, how can it not?
    We express our reality with every action we make. Every choice tells the world something real about us.
    We cannot help but infuse our avatars with intimations of our human reality.

    What is real?

    Real is when someone at joys and concerns at a UU church service in Second Life shares that he has lost his job (and this, sadly, is shared all too often these days, in all of the social circles of Second Life).
    Real is when one of your communities reminds a member faithfully every night to take his medications.
    Real is when an acquaintance lets your community know she is undergoing chemotherapy.
    Real is when your friend tells you her plans to leave her husband, who has Asperger’s, and to whom she is married only in name.
    Real is when that friend tells you her husband has pancreatic cancer and she has decided to stick by him until he dies.

    Sometimes, sometimes,
    there is a connection.
    And I don’t mean romance, or sex.
    I mean those moments when we choose to reveal our hearts to another, and to witness another’s heart with respect and love.
    That can happen here.
    Is it not what we are hoping will happen at this very moment?

    What is real?

    This moment is real.

    Savor it.

    Hymn 128 For All That Is Our Life

    Closing Words The Tempest Act 4, scene 1, 148–158, William Shakespeare
    Prospero:
    Our revels now are ended. These our actors,
    As I foretold you, were all spirits, and
    Are melted into air, into thin air:
    And like the baseless fabric of this vision,
    The cloud-capp’d tow’rs, the gorgeous palaces,
    The solemn temples, the great globe itself,
    Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,
    And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,
    Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff
    As dreams are made on; and our little life
    Is rounded with a sleep.

    Go in peace.

  • OK, if he doesn’t want us to read his papers

    [Rupert] Murdoch plans to put News Corp content, including from UK newspapers such as the Sun and the Times, behind a paywall and has threatened to remove it from Google’s search index and Google News. (“Google to allow publishers to limit free news access”)

    A paywall is fine, if he thinks that will work for his company (I have my doubts), but if the stories don’t show up on Google I won’t ever read them. The newspaper sites I go to daily are the Guardian, Aljazeera, China Daily, and the Imperial Valley Press, and I get a daily email of headlines from the New York Times, but I also read other newspapers when I am searching for coverage of specific news. In that case, I typically use Google as my search engine.

    It’s certainly an interesting time for journalism. I’m eager to see what new business models arise from the ashes. Let’s all hope that the dross is what is cut away and that incisive, insightful reporting and investigation in the public interest is what survives.

  • Maybe better than green bean casserole!

    I am so making this:

    Tater Tot Casserole is essentially a prepared foods version of Shepherd’s Pie: cooked meat, vegetables, and a sauce, topped with potatoes and baked, and finished with cheese.

    via Second Breakfast » Tater Tot Casserole.

  • World Toilet Day

    World Toilet Organization WTO is a global non- profit organization committed to improving toilet and sanitation conditions worldwide.

  • Just what the hell is he supposed to do? (a rant)

    Okay, I do get why people are saying that giving Barack Obama the Nobel Peace Prize seems premature, when he’s been in office a bare nine months. On the other hand, the committee seemed quite clear that the award is meant as encouragement for his positions as much as for anything he’s accomplished. It’s a great honor, not only for Obama, but for the American people. He did not seek it. And I believe he has made some significant accomplishments already. And so I have very little patience for all the cavilling.

    But for the people (on the right and on the left) who think he should “accomplish” something before he gets the prize: Just what is it you think he should accomplish? World peace? Is that what it takes before people stop bitching about whoever wins the Peace Prize?

    I agree that Obama could get us out of Afghanistan and Iraq. And yes, I think he should, and yes, that’s a big part of why I voted for him. On the other hand, George W. Bush and company put us into a big, fucking mess. A BIG FUCKING MESS THAT WILL BE A BIG FUCKING MESS TO GET OUT OF. It seems likely there is no good outcome for either Iraq or Afghanistan. So I have some sympathy for Obama. But yes, I agree, Obama could put on his big boy pants, order us out of those wars, and take the inevitable shit that would come.

    But Israel and Palestine? Islamist militants in a score of countries? The Iranian republic edging into a dictatorship? North Korean nukes? Give me a break. One person, even the president of the United States, cannot fix those problems. The Nobel Peace Prize committee has handed out awards for people who have “accomplished” something in the Middle East like candy, and Israel still illegally occupies the West Bank and Gaza, and Palestinian militants still illegally attack and terrorize Israel. They are going to have to find their own way out of the mess they’re in (and everyone else who is in a mess will, too). As for the unconscionable military aid the U.S. government gives to Israel, stopping that will require some backbone in the U.S. Congress, not the Executive Branch.

    What do I think he’s accomplished? I think he was elected president. And if you don’t think that is an accomplishment on behalf of peace, I think you underestimate the depth of racial animosity that has characterized U.S. history, or are tone deaf to the hope and potential for reconciliation that Obama’s election represent.

    And I think the effects of his words are accomplishments. Many comments are of the nature that he is, so far, all talk and no action. But see above: There are many problems in this world which no president of the United States can solve. But there are problems that the person holding that office can speak to, and if people listen, if their minds and hearts are changed or encouraged, then they might act. And really, talking is in fact how politicians act. The budget? Passed by Congress. Laws? Enacted by Congress. How? They talk to each other and try to convince one another. (Or lobbyists talk to them and try to give them convincing cover stories for getting in bed with big money concerns.) How does a president influence the budget and laws? Talking. (Excepting, of course, the use of the veto.)

    Lasting goodwill among nations? Talking! Fairness in trade and international affairs requires acting in certain ways, but really, these actions need to be taken in concert, and need to reflect the desires and needs of all the parties. How do you do that? Talking! So don’t give me this “all talk and no action” crap. Talking is an act.

    Here endeth the rant. And my non-ranting olive branch to the nay-sayers? Yes, I agree with many who say Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize because he isn’t George W. Bush. And you know what I say to that? Amen! Hallelujah! I just wish that war criminal and his war criminal cronies were in prison for the rest of their natural lives. (Oops! The ranting wasn’t all out of my system!)

  • A favorite childhood author reviewed

    I felt exactly this same way:

    I understood that they were just made up, that Henderson was a writer, that there weren’t any People, that nobody was going to find me and sort out my teenage angst and teach me to fly—and then again, on the other hand...

    by Jo Walton over at Tor.com: Lonely and special: Zenna Henderson’s Ingathering.

  • Interview with a New Yorker

    A The New Yorker copy editor, that is! I especially liked her comment that “The hours at The New Yorker are from ten to six, and I try to be on time, as it is embarrassing to be chronically late when you don’t have to be at the office till ten.” It’s interesting to find out the differences with book editing (and with the processes we have at UU World).

    Although my details differ, I have this same feeling about my job:

    The thing I like most about my job is that it draws on my entire background. I know a little Italian and Greek that sometimes come in handy. I once caught a mistake in Middle English (in a piece by Andrew Porter yet)—the only time my graduate degree has ever had a practical use. I know the name of the airport in Cleveland, and that can be useful when you’re reading a piece of fiction by a Southern writer who is making things up about northern Ohio. It’s redemptive to have a practical use for the arcana of Roman Catholicism.

    via Copy Editing at The New Yorker Magazine. An Interview With Mary Norris | Red Room.

  • Reflections on Yom Kippur 5770

    Wonderful reflections on a Yom Kippur retreat by Rachel Barenblat at Velveteen Rabbi: Yom Kippur 5770.

    The gates of repentance are open to anyone who approaches them with an open heart. There is an infinite source of love available to us, and we are always already forgiven. We just have to come knocking.